The opinion of the court was delivered by: Miller, S.J.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Christine Dalton, District Associate Judge.
A mother appeals the juvenile court order terminating her parental rights. AFFIRMED.
Considered by Danilson, P.J., Tabor, J., and Miller, S.J.*fn1
I. Background Facts & Proceedings
Autumn is the mother of three children, born in 2007, 2009, and 2010.
The State filed a petition on July 8, 2010, seeking court intervention for the two oldest children due to the mother's drug use, mental health issues, domestic violence in her relationships, and homelessness. The juvenile court entered an order adjudicating these two children to be in need of assistance under Iowa Code sections 232.2(6)(b), (c)(2), and (n) (2009). The dispositional order placed the children in the care of their mother, subject to supervision by the Iowa Department of Human Services. In a later order, the youngest child was adjudicated to be in need of assistance under the same code sections.
The children were removed from the mother's care on July 12, 2011, after she left the children and went to Chicago with her boyfriend for a week, where she smoked marijuana every day. Additionally, the mother had been inconsistent in her participation in services and was not working on treatment for substance abuse. The middle child was placed with her paternal grandmother, while the other two children were placed in foster care.
As the case progressed the two oldest children revealed they had been sexually abused by one of the mother's boyfriends. The mother became involved in a new substance abuse treatment program. She did not consistently meet with her therapist to address her mental health problems. During supervised visits the mother had difficulty watching all three children. The mother also continued to have problems with homelessness.
On July 10, 2012, the State filed petitions seeking termination of the mother's parental rights and the parental rights of the father of the oldest child and the father of the youngest child. On September 19, 2012, the middle child was also placed in foster care. The juvenile court terminated the mother's parental rights under sections 232.116(1)(d), (f) (the oldest child), (h) (the two youngest children), and (i) (2011).*fn2 The court found credibility was a problem for the mother. The court noted she had not been able to maintain stability for herself, let alone her children, for several years. The court concluded termination of the mother's parental rights was in the children's best interests. Autumn appeals the termination of her parental rights.
The scope of review in termination cases is de novo. In re D.W., 791 N.W.2d 703, 706 (Iowa 2010). Clear and convincing evidence is needed to establish the grounds for termination. In re J.E., 723 N.W.2d 793, 798 (Iowa 2006). Where there is clear and convincing evidence there is no serious or substantial doubt about the correctness of the conclusion drawn from the evidence. In re D.D., 653 N.W.2d 359, 361 (Iowa 2002). "The paramount concern in termination proceedings is the best interest of the child." In re D.S., 806 N.W.2d 458, 465 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011).
Autumn asserts the Department did not make reasonable efforts to correct the adjudicatory harm. She claims she had been doing all the things she needed to do to comply with the case plan, and it was the services in this case which were deficient. She claims that if her mental health problems had been accurately diagnosed and treated it is more likely she would have been able to obtain housing.
"Reasonable efforts to reunite parent and child are required prior to the termination of parental rights." In re M.B., 595 N.W.2d 815, 818 (Iowa Ct. App. 1999). Reasonable efforts include both services to prevent the need for removal and services to implement reunification. In re N.N., 692 N.W.2d 51, 55 (Iowa Ct. App. 2004). "The Department has an obligation to make reasonable efforts toward reunification, but a parent has an equal obligation to demand other, different, ...