Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Gary D. McKenrick, Judge.
Kelsey Harris appeals her conviction and sentence for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated under Iowa Code section 321J.2 (2011).
Angela Fritz Reyes, Davenport, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Benjamin M. Parrott, Assistant Attorney General, Michael J. Walton, County Attorney, and William Ripley, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
Considered by Eisenhauer, C.J., and Danilson and Bower, JJ.
Kelsey Harris appeals her conviction and sentence for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated under Iowa Code section 321J.2 (2011). Harris argues she was denied a speedy trial pursuant to Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.33(2)(a), and was denied due process. Because we find that rule 2.33 does not apply in this case, and because Harris can show no prejudice from the alleged due process violation, we affirm.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings
On April 23, 2011, Kelsey Harris, then a minor, was involved in a motor vehicle accident during which she failed to obey a stop sign and collided with another driver. A Davenport police officer responded to the scene and observed that Harris had bloodshot eyes and her breath smelled of alcohol. He also observed Harris was wearing a wrist band consistent with having been at a drinking establishment. After an initial denial, Harris admitted to having consumed alcohol. The officer administered several field sobriety tests, each of which Harris failed. A preliminary breath test registered a blood alcohol concentration of .175, more than double the legal limit. Harris submitted to a further breath test after she was arrested, which registered a .156 blood alcohol concentration, also in excess of the legal limit.
Three days later Davenport police filed complaints alleging: (1) operating while intoxicated, (2) failure to obey a traffic control device, and (3) failure to maintain liability insurance. The operating while intoxicated complaint was returned by the clerk of court, due to Harris' age, but the other two charges were filed. On May 10, 2011, Harris pleaded guilty to the two traffic violations.
On January 9, 2012, after Harris turned eighteen years old, the reporting officer filed a complaint in the district court for the offense of operating while intoxicated. Harris was subsequently charged by trial information on February 15, 2012. She filed a motion to dismiss and argued that her right to a speedy trial and due process rights had been violated under state law. The district court denied the motion, and Harris was convicted after a bench trial on the minutes of testimony. She appeals from the denial of the motion to dismiss.
II. Standard of Review
We normally review a district court's ruling on a motion to dismiss for abuse of discretion. State v. Nelson, 600 N.W.2d 598, 601 (Iowa 1999). Where, as here, the ruling is based upon an interpretation of the speedy trial rule, however, we review for ...