IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KELLI JO MULDER AND TODD MULDER Upon the Petition of KELLI JO MULDER, Petitioner-Appellee, And Concerning TODD MULDER, Respondent-Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Douglas F. Staskal, Judge.
Todd Mulder appeals from the decree dissolving his marriage to Kelli Jo Mulder.
D. Raymond Walton of Beecher Law Offices, Waterloo, for appellant.
John S. Harding of Harding Law Office, Des Moines, for appellee.
Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Bower, JJ.
Todd Mulder appeals from the decree dissolving his marriage to Kelli Jo Mulder. Todd argues the district court erred in awarding Kelli the marital home without requiring her to immediately pay him his share of the equity in the home. He also argues the district court erred when it did not order Kelli to refinance a 2009 Chevrolet Traverse into her name only. Because we find it appropriate to delay payment of Todd's equity share in the home until ninety days after the oldest child graduates from high school, unless Kelli sells or refinances the home, and because we find it equitable to award Kelli the Traverse but remove Todd from any financing obligation, we affirm as modified.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings
Todd and Kelli Jo Mulder's nineteen year marriage ended with the filing of a decree of dissolution of marriage on August 15, 2012. The parties have two children, who were fifteen and thirteen years old at the time of the decree. Following their separation Kelli remained in the marital home with the children and Todd moved into a townhouse. The parties divided most of their personal property prior to trial.
Trial was held to determine the distribution of a small number of personal items, distribution of the equity in their home, child support, and visitation. Following trial the district court entered a decree which found the parties had $84, 343.50 of equity in their home and ordered Kelli to pay Todd his share of the equity within ninety days after their oldest child graduates from high school.
Todd filed a motion to reconsider asking the district court to add certain contingencies to the home equity distribution. Among those requests was that Kelli be required to refinance the home within sixty days of the entry of the ruling. Todd then requested the court order Kelli to pay him his share of the equity in the home should she sell, refinance, remarry, cohabitate, or take on a roommate. Finally, Todd asked that Kelli be required to refinance a motor vehicle jointly owned by the parties. The district court denied the motion.
II. Standard of Review
As an equitable proceeding, we review the decree of dissolution of marriage de novo. Iowa R. App. P. 6.907. Though we are not bound by the district court's findings, we will give them weight. In re ...