LINDA R. READE, Chief District Judge.
The matter before the court is Defendant Randy Beltramea's "Motion to Sever Multiple Counts Against Defendant" ("Motion") (docket no. 44).
II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 21, 2013, the government filed a sixteen count Superseding Indictment (docket no. 17) against Defendant. Counts 1 and 2 charge Defendant with committing wire fraud for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud and obtain money by means of false and fraudulent representations and promises in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The alleged scheme involved Defendant fraudulently obtaining money from his investment clients for the purported purpose of investing in restaurants. Counts 1 and 2 also contain forfeiture allegations.
Count 3 charges Defendant with aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). Count 3 also contains forfeiture allegations.
Counts 4 through 6 charge Defendant with knowingly engaging and attempting to engage in monetary transactions in criminally derived property affecting interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. These alleged financial transactions each involved wire fraud proceeds in excess of $10, 000. Counts 4 and 5 also contain forfeiture allegations.
Count 7 charges Defendant with knowingly conducting and attempting to conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate commerce involving the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i). Count 7 also contains forfeiture allegations.
Counts 8 through 13 charge Defendant with knowingly making material false statements or reports for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014.
Counts 14 and 15 charge Defendant with willfully failing to file tax returns for calendar years 2009 and 2010 in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203.
Count 16 charges Defendant with willfully attempting to evade or defeat the payment of tax in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201.
On October 2, 2013, Defendant filed the Motion, which requests that the court sever Counts 1 through 7 from Counts 8 through 16. On October 7, 2013, the government filed a Resistance (docket no. 45). The motion is fully submitted and ready for decision.
In his Brief in Support of the Motion (docket no. 44-1), Defendant argues that Counts 1 through 7 were improperly joined with Counts 8 through 16 under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8. Defendant further contends that, even if the charges were properly joined, the court should ...