Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Duff

Court of Appeals of Iowa

February 19, 2014

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MASCHELLE J. DUFF, Defendant-Appellant

Editorial Note:

This opinion is subject to modification or correction by the court and is not final until the time for rehearing or further review has passed.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, James C. Ellefson, Judge. Maschelle Duff appeals her convictions for assault on a peace officer and interference with official acts.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Robert Ranschau, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Bridget Chambers, Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer Miller, County Attorney, and Suzanne Lampkin, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Doyle, P.J., and Tabor and Bower, JJ.

OPINION

BOWER, J.

Maschelle Duff appeals her convictions for assault on a peace officer and interference with official acts. Duff argues there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions. As there is substantial evidence to show Duff intended to harm Officer Ball and knowingly resisted or obstructed lawful orders given by Ball, we affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings

On May 8, 2012, Melbourne, Iowa Police Chief Michael Ball (Ball) obtained an arrest warrant for Maschelle Duff (Duff). Ball decided to serve the warrant by conducting a traffic stop of Duff's vehicle, believing this would be safer than arresting Duff at her home. While waiting for Duff to return home, Ball, who was in uniform at the time, spotted Duff in her vehicle. Ball made eye contact with Duff, at which point Duff stopped her vehicle in the middle of the street. After Ball activated the emergency lights on his squad car, Duff backed into a driveway. Attempting to prevent Duff from driving away, Ball pulled up and parked his vehicle in front of the driveway. After again making eye contact with Duff, Ball gestured for Duff to stop. Duff shook her head to indicate she would not do so and while maintaining eye contact quickly accelerated towards the driver's door of Ball's car. The vehicles did not collide as Ball was able to move his car to avoid Duff

Missing Ball's car, Duff drove through a neighboring yard and back onto the street. Anticipating Duff's destination, Ball was able to arrive at Duff's house first and parked next to the driveway. Ball stood in Duff's driveway in an attempt to prevent her from entering her home. After being directed to stop, Duff drove up the driveway towards Ball. Ball quickly moved out of the way to avoid being hit and began ordering Duff to exit her car. After several minutes and with the assistance of two other police officers, Duff exited the car and was arrested.

II. Standard of Review

Our review of challenges to the sufficiency-of-the-evidence is for errors at law. State v. Sanford, 814 N.W.2d 611, 615 (Iowa 2012). We consider the record in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, including all reasonable inferences that may have been drawn. Id. The verdict will be upheld when supported by substantial evidence. Id. " Evidence is considered substantial if, when viewed in the light most favorable to the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.