United States District Court, Northern District of Iowa, Central Division
February 17, 2015
MICHELLE MARIE KRUGER, Plaintiff,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
MARK W. BENNETT U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
This case is before me on plaintiff Michelle Marie Kruger’s (Kruger) Application For Attorney’s Fees, which she filed on September 19, 2014 (docket no. 23). Kruger’s application follows my June 25, 2014, order in which I accepted Judge Strand’s Report and Recommendation, reversed the Commissioner of Social Security’s (the Commissioner’s) decision denying Kruger disability benefits, and remanded Kruger’s claim to the Commissioner for further consideration (docket no. 21). The Clerk entered judgment in Kruger’s favor on June 25, 2014 (docket no. 22).
“[F]ees and other expenses” may be awarded to a “prevailing party” in a Social Security appeal under the EAJA, “unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (emphasis added). For purposes of this subsection, “fees and other expenses” include “reasonable attorney fees.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A). In order to obtain an award, the party must apply for the award “within thirty days of final judgment in the action” and “allege that the position of the United States was not substantially justified.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). If attorney’s fees are appropriate, the reasonable hourly rate for such fees is set by statute at $125, “unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A)(ii).
Here, according to the Commissioner’s Response To Plaintiff’s Application For Attorney Fees Pursuant To The Equal Access to Justice Act (docket no. 24) the parties agree to an award of EAJA fees and expenses in the amount of $6, 767.92. The requested award under the EAJA is just and appropriate. Therefore, I grant Kruger’s application for attorney’s fees, plus expenses, in the amount of $6, 767.92. The fee award shall be paid by the Social Security Administration. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(4). In Astrue v. Ratliff, the United States Supreme Court held that, under the EAJA, statutory attorney’s fees awards must be payable to the prevailing social security plaintiff, not her attorney. 560 U.S. 586, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010). However, if consistent with the Commissioner’s and the Department of Treasury’s practice, the EAJA payment may be mailed to Kruger’s attorney, Niki Fisher. See, e.g., Theis v. Astrue, 828 F.Supp.2d 1006, 1011 (E.D. Ark. 2011) (directing that EAJA “award be made payable to the plaintiff . . . and mailed to [plaintiff’s attorney], pursuant to the Commissioner’s standard method of issuing payment”).
IT IS SO ORDERED.