Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Community Action Agency of Siouxland v. Belle of Sioux City, L. P.

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division

April 18, 2017

COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND, Plaintiff,
v.
BELLE OF SIOUX CITY, L.P. and IOWA GAMING COMPANY, LLC, Defendants.

          ORDER

          LINDA R READE, JUDGE

         TABLE OF CONTENTS

         I. INTRODUCTION. . ..................................... 1

         II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY.. ....................... 2

         III. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION .......................... 2

         IV. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND.. ...................... 3

A. Parties.. ......................................... 3
B. Overview of the Dispute. . ............................. 3

         V. ANALYSIS ............................................ 5

A. Standard of Review. . ................................ 5
B. Unjust Enrichment Claim ..............................6
1. Enriched by a benefit. . .......................... 8
2. Community Actions's expense ...................... 10

         VI. CONCLUSION. . ...................................... 12

         I. INTRODUCTION

         The matter before the court is Defendants Belle of Sioux City (“Belle”) and Iowa Gaming Company's (“Iowa Gaming”) (collectively, “Defendants”) “Motion to Dismiss” (“Motion”) (docket no. 10).

         II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY

         On November 30, 2016, Plaintiff Community Action Agency of Siouxland (“Community Action”) filed a Petition (docket no. 3) in the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County. On December 27, 2016, the matter was removed, bringing the case before the court. See Notice of Removal (docket no. 1). On January 25, 2017, Defendants filed the Motion. On February 15, 2017, Community Action filed a Resistance to the Motion (“Resistance”) (docket no. 13). On March 3, 2017, Defendants filed a Reply (“Reply”) (docket no. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.