Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Finck

Court of Appeals of Iowa

January 23, 2019

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JASIAH THANE FINCK, Defendant-Appellant.

          Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Warren County, Patrick W. Greenwood, Judge.

         Jasiah Finck appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial.

          Patrick W. O'Bryan, Des Moines, for appellant.

          Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Israel Kodiaga, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

          Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ.

          MULLINS, JUDGE.

         The evidence presented at trial includes the following. Jasiah Finck and Shawna Davidson[1] were married in 2006. Their marriage was dissolved in 2009. The marriage produced one child, C.D., born in 2008. The dissolution-of-marriage decree awarded Shawna sole legal custody and physical care of the child. As to visitation, the decree ordered:

Jasiah Finck . . . shall have rights of visitation as the parties may agree. If the parties are unable to agree, Jasiah will have visitation every Monday (8:00 a.m. until noon) and every Wednesday (8:00 a.m. until noon). All visitations shall take place at Shawna's residence or at another mutually agreeable location until Jasiah Finck has his own suitable residence. If Jasiah is to transport [C.D.] he shall utilize a licensed driver or shall show proof to Shawna Davidson that he has a valid driver's license.

The decree has never been modified.

         In or about 2015, Shawna and C.D. moved to South Carolina and Shawna remarried. In March 2017, as a result of C.D.'s school and behavioral issues and some problems between C.D. and his stepfather, Shawna contacted Finck and proposed C.D. return to Iowa and live with Finck's parents, Kirk and Gwen, for approximately six months. Finck forwarded the proposal to his parents, and they agreed. The arrangement was for Kirk and Gwen to care for the child in their home, and the child could potentially be transitioned into Finck's care after six months if he showed the ability to be a responsible parent. Finck moved into his parents' home the same day as C.D. Gwen testified Finck moved in with them "because he didn't have anyplace else to go at the time." The arrangement went well for the first few months but eventually soured as a result of Finck's lifestyle choices. In early July, Gwen and Kirk asked Finck to find his own place to live and advised Shawna it would be in C.D.'s best interests to move back to South Carolina. Finck was upset about his parents' decision to send C.D. back to South Carolina. He moved out of his parents' home on or about July 3.

         On July 11, a Tuesday, when Shawna was on her way to Iowa to retrieve C.D., Finck, unbeknownst to Gwen and Kirk, picked the child up from his day program shortly after the lunch hour and did not return him home. Finck text messaged Gwen at 3:30 p.m. and advised he retrieved the child from school and was taking him to a friend's overnight. Finck did not advise who the friend was or where the friend lived. Gwen stated her disagreement with the same and requested to speak with C.D.; Finck denied her request. Gwen learned from a third party that Finck may have taken the child to the Kansas City area. Gwen conveyed the information to Shawna for the purpose of letting her decide what should be done about the situation.

         Pursuant to her discussion with Shawna, [2] Gwen ultimately made contact with law enforcement and advised C.D. was missing, Finck had taken him from school, and Finck reported they would be back by noon on July 12. However, by approximately 1:15 p.m. on July 12, the child had yet to be returned. By this point in time, neither Finck's parents nor Shawna had been able to reach Finck to verify his and the child's whereabouts. At approximately 2:11 p.m., Shawna received the following text message from Finck: "I'm having car troubles in a little town on the Iowa border. Getting my car fixed. I'll be back. [C.D.] will be back in school by 4:30." Gwen was able to make contact with Finck at 2:30 p.m., at which time he advised he would have the child back in two hours. At roughly 3:00 p.m., law enforcement decided to triangulate Finck's cell phone to attempt to verify his location. Records received from the cell phone company showed Finck was in the Kansas City area from 2:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m., at which time Finck's phone powered down. Local law enforcement put a report out to Iowa and Kansas City law enforcement to be on the lookout for Finck as a noncustodial child abductor. Finck was apprehended at approximately 5:15 p.m. in the Kansas City area. The arresting officer observed Finck's vehicle to be functioning properly.

         Finck testified at trial on his own behalf. He testified no restrictions were placed upon his time with C.D. while the child was living with Kirk and Gwen. He testified he has "full rights" to C.D. and he did not believe he had to ask for anyone's permission to take him somewhere. He also testified that on the day in question he picked C.D. up from school shortly after lunch and "left for Kansas City." He did not immediately advise anyone of his plan because he "didn't feel that [he] needed to." Between 3:00 and 4:00 p.m., Finck advised his mother he had picked C.D. up from the day program, but he did not tell her he was taking the child to Kansas City; Finck could not recall during his testimony when he advised Shawna of the same. Finck testified his intention was to return the following day or the following night. He also testified he was in contact with Shawna "probably a half a dozen" times on July 12. He then testified his phone died because he was experiencing electrical problems with his car and could not charge his cell phone. According to Finck, when he was apprehended by law enforcement, he was preparing to leave the Kansas City area around "6:30 or 7" p.m. and return to Iowa with the child. Finck conceded on cross-examination that he knew Shawna was "upset" about the situation and that he never contacted Shawna or Gwen to advise he would not be returning the child on time. However, he maintained the position that he and Shawna reached an agreement that he could take C.D. to Kansas City and his actions were not in violation of that agreement.

         In relation to the foregoing events, Finck was charged by trial information with third-degree kidnapping and violating a custodial order.[3] A jury found him guilty of the latter charge. Finck filed a motion for a new trial, arguing "there was insufficient evidence to convict."[4] The ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.