Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re S.C.

Court of Appeals of Iowa

December 18, 2019

IN THE INTEREST OF S.C., J.C., A.C., and J.C., Minor Children, S.H., Mother, Appellant.

          Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Mark C. Cord III, District Associate Judge.

         A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to four children.

          Jessica R. Noll of Deck Law PLC, Sioux City, for appellant mother.

          Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Ellen Ramsey-Kacena, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.

          Maxine Buckmeier of Maxine M. Buckmeier, P.C., Sioux City, attorney and guardian ad litem for minor children.

          Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., Mullins, J., and Vogel, S.J. [*]

          VAITHESWARAN, PRESIDING JUDGE.

         A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to four children, born in 2008, 2011, 2012, and 2015.[1] She contends (1) the record lacks clear and convincing evidence to support the grounds for termination cited by the district court; (2) termination was not in the children's best interests; and (3) the district court should have afforded her six additional months to work toward reunification.

         We may affirm if we find clear and convincing evidence to support any of the grounds cited by the district court. See In re A.B., 815 N.W.2d 764, 774 (Iowa 2012). On our de novo review, we focus on Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(f) (2019), which requires proof of several elements including proof the children cannot be returned to the mother's custody.

         The State applied to have the children temporarily removed from the mother's care after a man who was staying with her beat one of the children with a belt, causing "deep, black blue" bruising on "almost his entire right leg." The district court granted the application, later ordered the children's continued removal, and adjudicated them in need of assistance. The children remained out of the mother's care through the termination hearing fourteen months later.

         The oldest child was in no position to be returned to his mother's custody. According to the department of human services case manager, his behaviors required ongoing placement in a group care facility and he had an unhealthy bond with the mother-an outgrowth of having to serve as her caretaker as well as the younger children's caretaker. She testified the child "carrie[d] a great deal of guilt about everything."

         The second child, who reported severe trauma at the age of four, was doing well in her foster placement and, according to the case manager, had "completed the majority of the trauma narrative." The case manager stated the mother was not capable of parenting her.

         As for the third child, he was hospitalized at the age of five based on "out of control" behaviors and "homicidal tendencies." His behaviors improved following his placement in a highly-structured foster home where the foster parents provided him with "step by step instructions" to complete daily activities such as brushing his teeth. Although the foster home was not a permanent placement option, the lack of structure in the mother's home precluded return of the child to her custody.

         The fourth child was the only child with whom the mother had regular contact in the form of weekly supervised visits. Although the mother testified that the visits went well, the case manager expressed concern about her ability to protect any of the children and set ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.